A record setting fiscal year – 2009
Congratulations to team Obama who not only set the record, they actually obliterated the record deficits set by the Bush administration. Obama didn’t beat, or even double it, nay…he tripled our national deficit.
WASHINGTON — The federal budget deficit tripled to a record $1.4 trillion for the 2009 fiscal year that ended last week, congressional analysts said Wednesday.
The Congressional Budget Office estimate, while expected, is bad news for the White House and its allies in Congress as they press ahead with health care overhaul legislation that could cost $900 billion over the next decade.
The unprecedented flood of red ink flows from several factors, including a big drop in tax revenues due to the recession, $245 billion in emergency spending on the Wall Street bailout and the takeover of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Then there is almost $200 billion in costs from President Obama’s economic stimulus bill, as well as increases in programs such as unemployment benefits and food stamps.
The previous record deficit was $459 billion and was set just last year.
The Obama health plan would be “paid for” with new revenues and curbs in spending. But the overhaul effort would eat up tax increases and spending cuts that could be used to bring the deficit down.
Obama has attributed the nation’s dismal fiscal situation to the financial and economic crises he inherited. White House Budget Director Peter Orzsag is overseeing the administration’s efforts to tackle the soaring deficit next year.
“As part of the fiscal 2011 budget, we will be putting forward proposals that return us to a fiscally sustainable path and that have lower deficits in the out-years,” Orszag said in a recent Associated Press interview.
So what is the best way to curb these staggering amounts of red ink flowing from Washington these days?? I am glad you asked. Nancy Pelosi has given us a tremendous answer today.
WASHINGTON (AP) – Confronted with big job losses and no sign the U.S. economy is ready to stand on its own, Democrats are working on a growing list of relief efforts, leaving for later how to pay for them, or whether even to bother.
Proposals include extending and perhaps expanding a popular tax credit for first-time home buyers, and creating a new credit for companies that add jobs. Taken together, the proposals look a lot like another economic stimulus package, though congressional leaders don’t want to call it that.
Democratic leaders in Congress and the White House say they have no appetite for another big spending package that adds to the federal budget deficit, which hit a record $1.4 trillion for the budget year that ended last week.
But with unemployment reaching nearly 10 percent, many lawmakers are feeling pressure to act. Some of the proposals come from the Republicans’ playbook and focus on tax cuts, even though they, too, would swell the deficit.
“We have to do something for the unemployed, politically and economically,” said Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., chairman of the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee.
The House already has voted to extend unemployment benefits an additional 13 weeks for laid off workers in the 27 states where the jobless rate is 8.5 percent or above. Senate Democrats reached a deal Thursday to extend the benefits an additional 14 weeks in every state. Both proposals are paid for by extending a federal unemployment tax.
Also on the table: extending subsidies for laid-off workers to help them keep the health insurance their former employers provided, known as COBRA. The current program, which covers workers laid off through the end of the year, costs nearly $25 billion.
Congressional leaders haven’t settled on the length of an extension, or how to pay for it.
Yes…its brilliant. Another stimulus package (although we can’t call it that) is the way to go. Since the first one worked so well and all, another one could only be better right? Ms. Pelosi stated today that the first stimulus “saved many many jobs, and created some as well” which is actually an extremely weak version of the typical Obama/Biden spin on the stimulus which purports that millions of jobs were created or saved. Since they have no way to come up with the number of “saved” jobs, I will continue to scoff at this incredibly weak assertion as to the success of a stimulus that really aimed at nothing more than pouring money into historically Democrat pet-projects, and money into government agencies. Stimulus starts on Main Street. Always has always will. Small businesses and consumers drive a free market into a recovery. Instead, Stimulus 1 was aimed at big corporations and government bureaucracy. Hence, we have seen no recovery, in fact the news has only gotten worse.
Check out the Heritage Foundations column today on what they view as some of the more wasteful elements of Anti-Stimulating Stimulus 1. We can only dream of more government programs and spending if they really want to shoot for Stimulus 2. (shh, don’t call it a stimulus)

This President continues to baffle. Yesterday he instructed Congress to start living by the pay-as-you-go rules instituted in the 1990’s. Today, he apparently wanted to qualify that, by saying that “pay-go” should not apply to his planned health care spending spree. The planned rules leave open the ability for Congress to borrow, or better yet, tack on to the federal deficit (that would be the record shattering federal deficit) in order to pay for this ambitiously socialist takeover of the nations health care. I mean, you need lots of money to start things up right?
